Ryan Clark once sparked debate by claiming Tom Brady was not a generational quarterback, pointing to Patrick Mahomes and John Elway as players with rare athletic traits that set them apart.
The comments came during a September 2025 episode of ESPN’s First Take, where Ryan Clark joined Stephen A. Smith and Dan Orlovsky to discuss whether Texas quarterback Arch Manning should be considered a “generational talent.”
As the discussion evolved, Clark used Brady, along with other greats, as a comparison point for defining elite-level ability.
Ryan Clark says Tom Brady’s success came from discipline, not raw talent
Ryan Clark explained that while Tom Brady is the most accomplished player in NFL history, he did not view him as a generational athlete.
He argued that the term should apply to players with exceptional physical tools and creativity, such as Patrick Mahomes and John Elway.
“I think John Elway was a generational talent. I think Patrick Mahomes is a generational talent.
“I don’t think Tom Brady, I don’t think Drew Brees, I don’t think Peyton Manning are generational talents. I think Andrew Luck ended up being one.”
Clark said Mahomes and Elway stood out for their arm strength, mobility, and improvisation, while Brady’s greatness came from his preparation and mental precision rather than natural athleticism.
Fans and analysts push back against Clark’s view
The remarks quickly drew backlash from NFL fans and analysts. Many said Brady’s seven Super Bowl titles and sustained excellence made him the ultimate definition of a generational player.
Social media users called Clark’s take “outrageous,” arguing that greatness should also reflect longevity and results.
Stephen A. Smith and Dan Orlovsky also questioned Clark’s definition on air, noting that Brady’s consistency and influence had reshaped modern football.
Clark, however, stood firm, saying his definition of “generational” focused solely on physical traits, not accolades or legacy.
Read more:
